There is no proof he is padding numbers, so let's be careful throwing names around. How do you know half the players aren't anonymous buff bots? If you have hard evidence then present it, otherwise this is just another random user making an accusation that can't be proven.Yeah I don't think it'll help them get players, was just disappointed when logging into Excal to see half the actual people on. Sort of unfair for the servers with accurate player counts, I suppose.
1. Calm down, Mr. Defensive.There is no proof he is padding numbers, so let's be careful throwing names around. How do you know half the players aren't anonymous buff bots? If you have hard evidence then present it, otherwise this is just another random user making an accusation that can't be proven.Yeah I don't think it'll help them get players, was just disappointed when logging into Excal to see half the actual people on. Sort of unfair for the servers with accurate player counts, I suppose.
No one, and I never claimed to be. I made an observation about a server and you jumped me. Use the information or don't,.Who the hell are you to accuse anyone of cheating? That's my point. You drop a server name then I'm on your ass for proof. For all I know you have a personal dislike for the server admin and are just blowing BS.
I find it humorous you think it's a JOB to enforce rules here. The only one I'm about to enforce is to ban you for being an ass. Apparently you think it's OK to either let people make accusations here at will, OR that every accusation should cause one of us "workers" to stop everything and go check out the validity of the claim.
So I'll ask a direct question of you.
Why should I trust anything you say?
Strike 2.
No one, and I never claimed to be. I made an observation about a server and you jumped me. Use the information or don't,.
I don't think it's a job. I never said that, and I'd be happy to elaborate on whatever I said to make you think I did.
Don't mistake this for a demand for action, just an observation. You seem to think if I notice a server breaking a rule it's my JOB to come and prove something to you. I don't care either way, I was simply conversing with Graveen.
Do what you will, buddy. Ragebans aren't something new in the freeshard world.
I gave a few good reasons... what exactly are you asking for? You seem to think I have some external goal other than simple conversation about a server. Your hostility is misplaced. If you'd like me to log on and take a screeshot of /online I can do that, but I'm not sure what that will prove. I could tell you I know for a fact being anon doesn't hide you from the /online zone count but you'd probably scream for hard evidence and threaten to ban me again.No one, and I never claimed to be. I made an observation about a server and you jumped me. Use the information or don't,.
I don't think it's a job. I never said that, and I'd be happy to elaborate on whatever I said to make you think I did.
Don't mistake this for a demand for action, just an observation. You seem to think if I notice a server breaking a rule it's my JOB to come and prove something to you. I don't care either way, I was simply conversing with Graveen.
Do what you will, buddy. Ragebans aren't something new in the freeshard world.
Last chance, in case you're just missing the key point. When you decide it's time to mention a server name on the forums and accuse them of cheating, which you did, you have to have a good reason. Your casual conversation ended when you mentioned a server name. It's really not that hard to understand. You've been here since 2005, so if I assume you joined when you were 15 that puts you around 23. Old enough to understand that accusations have consequences, I hope.
NoI gave a few good reasons
YesYou seem to think I have some external goal other than simple conversation about a server.
Strike 3. My first response was civil, yours was not. Toodles.Calm down and use that phpbb admin you're so proud of if you don't care to have a civil conversation.
I assume you mean /who all since DOL has no /online command.4. /online
4a. Don't have rules if you don't like the reality of upholding them.
I could tell you I know for a fact being anon doesn't hide you from the /online zone count
// get list of clients depending on server type
foreach (GameClient serverClient in WorldMgr.GetAllPlayingClients())
{
GamePlayer addPlayer = serverClient.Player;
if (addPlayer == null) continue;
if (serverClient.Account.PrivLevel > (uint)ePrivLevel.Player && serverClient.Player.IsAnonymous == false)
{
clientsList.Add(addPlayer.Client);
continue;
}
if (addPlayer.Client != client // always add self
&& client.Account.PrivLevel == (uint)ePrivLevel.Player
&& (addPlayer.IsAnonymous || !GameServer.ServerRules.IsSameRealm(addPlayer, client.Player, true)))
{
continue;
}
clientsList.Add(addPlayer.Client);
}
// no params
if (args.Length == 1)
{
int playing = clientsList.Count;
// including anon?
DisplayMessage(client, string.Format(MESSAGE_PLAYERS_ONLINE, playing, playing > 1 ? "s" : ""));
DisplayMessage(client, MESSAGE_NO_ARGS);
return;
}
No
Don't bother providing valid reasons, just exclaim your thoughts as fact. Devoid of justification I suppose this is your only recourse.Yes
Not even close. But rage-ban to make yourself feel better, no worries. It must be easier to win an argument after you block the other person from responding. Have a history of not doing so well when it's a two-sided engagement?Strike 3. My first response was civil, yours was not. Toodles.
You shouldn't make assumptions, they aren't working for you. I'm not sure how your brain jumped from /online to /who, but these words are very different. I'll chalk it up to another failing of your adolescent brain.I assume you mean /who all since DOL has no /online command.
Funny, because all of your responses make me think you have at least an iota of understanding on the topic. Oh wait, nope, this fits perfectly.If you were actually referring to a command called /online then this is a custom command someone added and I have no idea what it includes.
It's clear he removed the duping, as I expected he would. If you would have checked yesterday (or just general population over the past week+, you'd see he has 20-40 on at all times. Now it's 10-20, as is the actual population trend. But you felt like being an ignorant twat and building up your own ego-driven confirmation bias with your childish responses.So you see, just by reviewing your posting history I guessed you had no real basis for this claim, and I was correct. This is why I have so little tolerance for people who come here and accuse others of cheating. It's usually BS and probably because you were caught cheating and banned.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests